In short period of time how a simple man becomes the king of NARCOS ?

Pablo Escobar, a name that echoes through the corridors of Colombian history, was more than just a drug lord. His complex relationship with the Colombian government transformed the political and social landscape of the nation. If you are intrigued by the profound impact one man can have on an entire country, then this article is a must-read. Discover the intricate details of Escobar’s conflicts with the authorities and his indelible mark on Colombia.

How did Pablo Escobar help Colombia? Really that man is bad?

Perhaps hoping to win the support of everyday Colombians, Escobar became known for his philanthropic efforts, which led to the nickname Robin Hood. He built hospitals, stadiums, and housing for the poor. He even sponsored local soccer teams.

The Rise of Pablo Escobar.

Before delving into the conflict, it is essential to understand Pablo Escobar’s meteoric rise to power. Born in Rionegro, Colombia in 1949, Escobar began his criminal career dealing in contraband cigarettes and fake lottery tickets. By the late 1970s, he had established the Medellín Cartel, which grew to control a significant portion of the global cocaine market.

Transitioning from small-time hustles to drug trafficking, Escobar’s influence expanded exponentially. Utilizing a mix of bribes and brutal violence, he infiltrated many levels of Colombian society, making it difficult for the government to combat his cartel effectively.

Pablo offered colombian authorities? Is really that man is more powerful than the Govt.

In the late 1980s Escobar reportedly offered to pay off Colombia’s debt of $10 billion if he would be exempt from any extradition treaty. By the mid-1980s the Medellín cartel dominated the cocaine trade, with Escobar wielding incredible power and wealth.

What was the deal between Pablo and the Colombian government?

In 1991, Escobar surrendered to authorities, and was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment on a host of charges, but struck a deal of no extradition with Colombian President César Gaviria, with the ability of being housed in his own, self-built prison, La Catedral.

Escobar’s Political Aspirations.

Pablo Escobar did not restrict his ambitions to the underworld. He sought political power as a means to legitimate his vast wealth and secure immunity from extradition to the United States. In 1982, he was elected as an alternate member of the Chamber of Representatives of Colombia, representing the political party, New Liberalism.

However, Escobar’s political career was short-lived. Revelations about his criminal activities forced him to resign, thrusting him into direct conflict with the Colombian government and authorities. This marked the beginning of a violent campaign aimed at preserving his empire and eliminating those who opposed him.

The Conflict with Authorities.

Escobar’s relationship with the Colombian government was tumultuous, to say the least. The government sought to dismantle his cartel through various initiatives, including the extradition treaty with the United States, which Escobar vehemently opposed.

To counter these efforts, Escobar employed a strategy known as “plata o plomo,” meaning “silver or lead.” He either bribed officials or resorted to extreme violence, assassinating those who stood in his way. Judges, police officers, and politicians found themselves targets of Escobar’s wrath. The most infamous incident was the bombing of Avianca Flight 203 in 1989, which killed 110 people.

The Impact on Colombia.

Escobar’s reign wreaked havoc on Colombia, precipitating a period of extreme violence and social instability. The war between the Medellín Cartel and Colombian authorities claimed thousands of lives and instilled a climate of fear across the nation.

Economically, the influx of drug money led to both growth and disparity. While some sectors flourished due to the drug trade, the overall impact on legitimate businesses and infrastructure was devastating. Furthermore, the global perception of Colombia suffered, severely impacting tourism and foreign investments.

On the other hand, Escobar’s philanthropic efforts, such as building housing projects and football fields, endeared him to certain segments of the population. This complicated his legacy, rendering him a controversial figure both locally and internationally.

Conclusion: A Legacy of Infamy.

Pablo Escobar’s relationship with the Colombian government was marked by bloodshed, corruption, and a relentless pursuit of power. His conflicts with the authorities reshaped the nation, leaving a legacy of violence and economic turmoil. However, his story serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of unchecked ambition and corruption. Understanding Escobar’s impact is crucial for comprehending Colombia’s modern history and the ongoing battle against drug trafficking.

As Colombia continues to rebuild and heal from its past, the lessons from Escobar’s era remain pertinent. Reflecting on this dark chapter can help ensure that history does not repeat itself.